I mentioned in the intro that I clean house. I get a kick out of the commercials for the newest trendy items, like vacuums. I remember the door to door sales men that would try to convince my mother to buy their version of the same thing what's his name was selling under a different name. Things have changed. I was lucky enough to experiance some of these high end can't live without suckers and wasn't all too impressed. The Shark, Hoover and Dyson were mine to use like I do everyday when cleaning.
Starting with the Dyson, showy, light weight but the cost of matinace (extra filters) and a direction guide from hell turned me off. Still I ran the 600+ model and it's smaller version @ 300+ to find that sucking is something that did not hold true. Glides nice and works wonders the first couple of times but get some moisture in the wind tunnel you mite as well]
kiss it good bye. And the extention wand, what a pain in the ass. it wasn't made for a regular person who actually cleans.
The shark; won my heart. It's like a transformer for grownup's. Love being able to use it as an upright, or a canister, has friendly user extentions and the filters ... not badly priced. At last it has flaws. Plastic, where once it was metal and meant to hold strong was replaced with plastic tits, nibs, the things that hold it (lid, filters, cord) in place and they don't hold up too well. Breaking and becoming a nusence to where it is easier to toss than replace. Those parts are expensive and not covered under warrenty. But I'll give them a B+ where the floor roller got trashed the transforming vacuum still was functionable as a canister or carry about. Bravo.
after using the crem dela crems I picked up on clarence a hoover that kicked ass and is still doing so. It survived me without a flaw. Again remember I care for a house with 5 dogs and 3 cats. I vacuum several times a day. I could break it down, wash all, dries quickly and keeps sucking. A- though becuse the hepa filters are a bit high so DON'T get them wet.... my bad for not reading what I read.
Recap: non expensive sucked great (Hoover) The Shark made cleaning fun and the Dyson just sucked.
Starting with the Dyson, showy, light weight but the cost of matinace (extra filters) and a direction guide from hell turned me off. Still I ran the 600+ model and it's smaller version @ 300+ to find that sucking is something that did not hold true. Glides nice and works wonders the first couple of times but get some moisture in the wind tunnel you mite as well]
kiss it good bye. And the extention wand, what a pain in the ass. it wasn't made for a regular person who actually cleans.
The shark; won my heart. It's like a transformer for grownup's. Love being able to use it as an upright, or a canister, has friendly user extentions and the filters ... not badly priced. At last it has flaws. Plastic, where once it was metal and meant to hold strong was replaced with plastic tits, nibs, the things that hold it (lid, filters, cord) in place and they don't hold up too well. Breaking and becoming a nusence to where it is easier to toss than replace. Those parts are expensive and not covered under warrenty. But I'll give them a B+ where the floor roller got trashed the transforming vacuum still was functionable as a canister or carry about. Bravo.
after using the crem dela crems I picked up on clarence a hoover that kicked ass and is still doing so. It survived me without a flaw. Again remember I care for a house with 5 dogs and 3 cats. I vacuum several times a day. I could break it down, wash all, dries quickly and keeps sucking. A- though becuse the hepa filters are a bit high so DON'T get them wet.... my bad for not reading what I read.
Recap: non expensive sucked great (Hoover) The Shark made cleaning fun and the Dyson just sucked.
Comments
Post a Comment